Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders Clinical Study Group

The musculoskeletal pain disorders CSG is chaired by Professor Elaine Hay.

Annual report 2009

For more information on the recent activities of the Musculoskeletal Pain CSG please read the latest annual report.

Steering group

Members will sit on the group for 3-5 years. The current members of the CSG are:

Professor Elaine Hay (Chair)

Professor of Community Rheumatology, Keele University and Honorary Consultant Rheumatologist, Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent and Clinical Director of the Local (West Midlands - North) Research Network

Email: e.m.hay@cphc.keele.ac.uk Tel: 01782 583890

Professor Jim Woodburn

Professor of Rehabilitation Studies, Glasgow Caledonian University

Email: jim.woodburn@gcal.ac.uk  Tel: 0141 3318483

Dr Tamar Pincus

Reader in Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London

Email: t.pincus@rhul.ac.uk  Tel: 01784 443523

Professor Anthony Jones

Professor of Neuro-Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of Manchester

Email: anthony.jones@manchester.ac.uk  Tel: 0161 206 4266

Professor Nadine Foster

Professor of Musculoskeletal Health in Primary Care, University of Keele

Email: n.foster@keele.ac.uk  Tel: 01782 584705

Professor Gary Macfarlane

Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen

Email: g.j.macfarlane@abdn.ac.uk  Tel: 01224 552495

Professor Candy McCabe

Professor of Nursing and Pain Sciences, NIHR Career Development Fellow, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England

and

Consultant Nurse, Bath Centre for Pain Services, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Upper Borough Walls, Bath

Email: candy.mccabe@rnhrd.nhs.uk

Tel: 01225 465941 ext. 210

Dr David Walsh

Director, Arthritis Research UK Pain Centre, Associate Professor (Clinical Reader) in Rheumatology, Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG1 1PB.

E-mail: David.Walsh@nottingham.ac.uk

Tel: 0115 8231751 or 0115 8231766

Group meetings

The CSG will hold approximately two meetings per year. The CSG will fund travel costs (second class rail or equivalent) for CSG meetings (members or their deputies).

Meeting minutes
May 2008
July 2010

Regular teleconferences will also be held. Please click below for the minutes of these teleconferences:

 Teleconference minutes    
 January/February 2008  September 2008  May 2009
 August 2009  October 2009 January 2010

Members of the CSG will ensure participation in regular CSG Email Discussion Forums set up to facilitate progress of the CSG’s research agenda, development of specific projects, and fulfilling the CSG’s remit.

Other meetings

Musculoskeletal Pain CSG workshops

A meeting was held on 10th October 2008 to discuss the progress of the Musculoskeletal Pain CSG to date. Read the report from the meeting.

A further workshop was held on 26th October 2009 to provide an opportunity for networking and a summary of the current status of the Musculoskeletal Pain CSG. Read the report from the workshop.

Podiatry research consensus meeting

The CSG recently held a meeting to develop, through consensus, a prioritised list of research related to musculoskeletal foot and ankle pain and podiatry. Please click here to view the report from this meeting. View the presentation summarising the meeting.

Think tank meetings

Following the Musculoskeletal Pain CSG meeting in October 2008, the agreed action point from the meeting was to set up further “Think-Tank” meetings to provide a forum for translating priority areas into specific research proposals. Further information on this proposal.

The group have held several ‘Think-tank’ meetings since the CSG was established. Further information on these meetings is available below:

Meeting Dates

Phenotyping and stepped care models March 2009
Optimal behavioural intervention March 2009
Targeted interventions for patellofemoral pain syndrome (TIPPS) October 2009

Strategy

Read the strategy.

The Musculoskeletal Pain CSG, formed by Arthritis Research UK, will support and develop a comprehensive portfolio of clinical studies directed towards and including clinical trials in all areas of musculoskeletal pain across the UK. It will advise Arthritis Research UK in defining research priorities in musculoskeletal pain for their support and adoption.

The CSG will bring together the expertise and enthusiasm necessary to establish an authoritative voice in the musculoskeletal pain research community directed towards clinical trials and related studies.

The CSG will have two main responsibilities:

  • Reactive and Proactive - to support and develop a portfolio of clinical studies directed towards and including clinical trials in all areas of musculoskeletal pain across the UK
  • Advisory - to advise Arthritis Research UK in defining research priorities in musculoskeletal pain for their support, submission for external funding and subsequent adoption to run through the CLRN

The remit of the CSG and its members is to:

  • Be responsible for developing and overseeing a comprehensive portfolio/strategy for clinical trials and related studies covering the spectrum of major disease areas in musculoskeletal pain
  • Propose and support the development of protocols for trials and related studies. These protocols where relevant will include the design of pilot and feasibility studies to provide proof of concept for definitive studies in terms of recruitment, data collection etc. The CSG will proactively advertise submissions of protocols needed to satisfy these goals, to be done in collaboration with the CSG
  • Review trial and related study protocols proposed by others (including industry proposals), to advise the CLRN and Arthritis Research UK how they may fit into the CSG portfolio/strategy and how the protocol could be assisted in its development
  • Provide robust scientific evaluation, expert advice and support to investigators
  • Ensure consumer involvement in all activities
  • Work in close collaboration with other CLRN and Arthritis Research UK  CSGs
  • Consider research “add-ons” to established protocols (e.g. pharmacogenetics and qualitative studies)
  • Provide regular reports to the CLRN and Arthritis Research UK  of its work and recommendations
  • Support the development of partnerships with other research funders (e.g. NIHR, MRC, Welcome, other AMRC funders) and industry in developing a comprehensive research programme in musculoskeletal pain
  • Uphold the highest standards of Research Governance and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) throughout its portfolio according to ICH-GCP guidelines, EU Directives on Clinical Trials and GCP, and UK law
  • CSG members with specific or general expertise may be asked to evaluate proposed trials from the pharmaceutical industry via the commercial trials adoption process under development with UKCRN. Evaluation will include relevance to the NHS and the important unmet needs of child health, statistical validity (at the level of an experienced clinical trialist) and feasibility. These evaluations will need to be undertaken as a matter of priority

Developing the Pain CSG Portfolio

The research priorities for the Pain Disorders Group will be developed through the following process. This process will be iterative in response to input from members of the group, Arthritis Research UK  and other group leaders.

Stage 1: Establish the Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders Clinical Studies Group

  • The Musculoskeletal Pain Clinical Studies Group, consisting of active research leaders from the field of musculoskeletal pain, will be established by the Chairman (EH), and terms of reference agreed
  • Nominated individuals will be chosen according to agreed criteria. This will be a “working” group, chosen from experts in main topical areas (e.g. back pain, regional pain, widespread pain); ideally with a range of methodological expertise (e.g. trials, qualitative, health economics, statistics) and representing a range of health care professionals, primary and secondary care and linking closely with representatives from the UK Clinical Research Network. Patient and public involvement will also be crucial.
  • To ensure that the Group is small enough to function effectively, ad-hoc working parties will be formed to facilitate wider consultation and coverage, or to address specific priority areas (these could be clinical, methodological or professional for example).

Stage 2: Scoping exercise

The Group will carry out a scoping exercise to

  1. identify current high quality trial and other clinical research activity in musculoskeletal pain,
  2. a mechanism for identifying duplications / opportunities for collaboration and gaps, and
  3. an inclusive, multi-professional group of users, researchers and clinicians to shape, and contribute to, the research programme and to develop new research questions.

This will be achieved by identifying key stake-holders through, for example, Special Interest Groups, professional societies (e.g. Physiotherapy, Pain Society), local and national networks, patient groups (e.g. Arthritis Care), Arthritis Research UK's list of grant-holders in appropriate areas, Medline search to identify Principal Investigators on key publications, and the National Research Register.

Stage 3: Priority setting

Building on the strengths, weaknesses and opportunities which will be highlighted by the scoping exercise, the Group, in close collaboration with the NIHR and other key stakeholders such as industry, will draw up short and longer (5 year) priorities for the Musculoskeletal Pain Research Agenda. This will be fed back to the broader research community for consultation. Once priority areas are agreed, the Group will widely advertise their proposed activities and seek submissions of research proposals in the priority areas. In close collaboration with Arthritis Research UK, NIHR, and group leaders from other topic specific areas, research proposals will be assessed to establish their fit with the Pain Disorders and NIHR priority areas. The ultimate goal will be to develop a linked series of clinical trials to investigate the effectiveness of the management of common painful musculoskeletal problems including conditions such as back pain, regional pain and widespread pain. The need for robust pilot studies, including carefully designed clinical cohort studies, proof of concept studies, feasibility studies of novel interventions, to support the development of future trials, will also be addressed.

Stage 4: Selecting proposals for development into full submissions

The exact procedure is being developed by Arthritis Research UK. It is likely that this will be a two stage process:

  1. Internal review of outline proposals by the Clinical Studies Group to identify the most strategically important projects, to rationalise duplicate projects and encourage collaboration.
  2. Outline proposals of high quality which “fit” the strategy would be worked up in a collaborative, facilitative process by the CSG and PIs to “MRC standard” and internationally reviewed before being forwarded to a newly formed Arthritis Research UK committee to agree funding for the research component. A process will be developed whereby the CSG Chairs work closely with the Comprehensive Local Research Network Clinical Directors and the UK Comprehensive Research Network Clinical Trials Unit to ensure that appropriate infrastructure support and service support costs are forthcoming from the NIHR.

For the “Pain disorders” group, this process raises particular challenges. Pain is a symptom not a disease and as such, research in this area may cut across other groups (e.g. osteoarthritis). Close collaboration between the Pain group leader and other group leaders will be crucial. The broad remit of this group does, however, provide exciting opportunities for multi-professional research employing a range of methodologies, and for research of non-pharmacological approaches to pain management. It will be important that the research portfolio is seen to be inclusive, covering a broad spectrum of areas including:

  1. Investigating the efficacy of novel interventions for musculoskeletal pain.
  2. Investigating broad models of care for common musculoskeletal problems including bio-psychosocial approaches, multidisciplinary working and complementary medicine, which are aimed at preventing chronicity, rather than providing symptomatic relief only.
  3. Investigating new models of delivering care for common musculoskeletal problems, for example using a range of health professionals working in extended roles, referral to interface clinics, and IT / Web based innovations.
  4. Investigating how clinicians’ behaviour can be changed, to ensure that existing research knowledge is effectively incorporated into everyday clinical practice.
  5. Investigating how views of patients and other members of the public can be truly represented and can constructively contribute to the research process.

The development of the portfolio will need to be underpinned by robust and novel methodological approaches, and funding proposals for pilot work, for example:

  1. Development and testing of new outcomes for use in research and clinical practice, including individualised patient-centred outcome measures.
  2. Development and testing of robust ways of collecting data in routine clinical care to facilitate a systematic approach to recruiting patients into clinical trials in primary and secondary care across a range of disciplines.
  3. Broadening of the current methodological framework to include multiple research approaches (e.g. health economics, health service research). In particular, qualitative methods will be used both as part of the development of intervention studies and in parallel to them to further understand patient and professional views of the conditions being studied, the treatment and health care being delivered, and the research process itself.
  4. Developing novel approaches to investigate mechanisms as well as outcomes.
  5. Involvement of practising health care professionals and patients in formulating research questions and designing appropriate, credible interventions.
  6. Working with clinicians to test the feasibility of incorporating interventions (shown to be effective in the trials programme), into clinical practice.

Stage 5: Measuring output

One further key task for the Group, together with Arthritis Research UK, will be to agree success criteria and performance targets for the research undertaken under the auspices of the Pain Disorders Group, and to put procedures in place to monitor that these are being achieved. It is crucial that the whole process described above is transparent and rigorous, that the targets set are achievable whilst at the same time ensuring research outputs of the highest quality, and that the outputs from the research portfolio can be shown to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.

Advisory members

A number of members can be appointed in an advisory capacity on a regular or an ad hoc basis depending on the needs of the CSG and related topic-specific subgroups.

Consumer representation

The CSG will involve consumers in all aspects of its work. Process for this to be discussed.

Priority setting process

Last year we held a 2 day “Think-Tank” at Keele which included a nationally representative multidisciplinary group of about 30 people who reflected on the findings from recent primary care trials of treatments for musculoskeletal pain and discussed recommendations and priorities for future trials.

The “think-tank” discussed methodological issues regarding recent trials including:

  • The heterogeneity of patients within physiotherapy trials may make it difficult to capture true treatment effects (McCarthy and Cairns 2005)
  • Inadequate identification of important patient subgroups (Hay et al 2005, McCarthy and Cairns 2005) may lead to insufficient targeting or individualisation of treatments
  • There may be overestimation of the specific effects of interventions on individual patients and underestimation of the contribution of the non-specific effects of the interventions (Thomas et al 2004)
  • Despite many trials now using a core set of recommended outcome measures (eg. Deyo et al 1998), we still fail to capture what is really important to patients In order to try to address some of these possible explanations, following a number of small group workshops, the group came up with 22 recommendations for future research priorities. These priorities have been ranked by physiotherapists at the World Congress (2007).

Contact details

For all enquiries and additional information, please contact: Professor Elaine Hay, chair of the musculoskeletal pain disorders CSG or the administrator Ms Claire Ashmore.

Share |